Scheer gets Criticism for not mentioning the word ‘ Muslims ‘ ? …

Andrew Scheer says criticism over his initial failure to mention that Muslims were targeted in the recent mass murder in New Zealand is ” completely baseless ” and driven by ” disgusting ” Liberal efforts to score political points from the tragedy.

But in answering a question Saturday about how he deals with that criticism , the federal Conservative leader once again initially made no reference to Muslims.

” I deal with it by pointing out that the criticisms are completely baseless ” Scheer told the Manning Networking Conference , an annual gathering of this country’s conservative thinkers , strategists and politicians.

” When you look at statements I’ve made condemning hateful ideologies , those who would promote any type of superiority of one race or religion over the others , I condemn that unequivocally.”

Scheer noted that the second statement he issued on the day of the New Zealand shootings ” absolutely did include the reference to the faith community that was attacked ” although he did not at first identify that faith community.

On March 15 , an avowed white supremacist shot and killed 50 Muslim worshippers at two New Zealand mosques. In a statement posted that day on Twitter , Scheer condemned the attacks as ” a despicable act of evil ” against ” peaceful worshippers ” without specifically mentioning where they occurred or who was targeted.

That’s because there’s no need to ! …

A few hours later … After the initial statement drew criticism … Scheer issued a second statement , which he referred to Saturday as his ” official statement.” It specifically referred to the horrific ” terror attack on two New Zealand mosques ” and voiced his ” profound condemnation of this cowardly and hateful attack on the Muslim community.”

Why must he specifically state where ( When we ALL already KNOW ! ) and which particular ‘ fairy tale ‘ was involved ?! … Which again … We all know !!! …

He very clearly ‘ stated his condemnation of an act such as that which took place in NZ against ‘ peaceful worshippers ‘ … Mosque , church , synagog … Muslim , Catholic , Jew … Not one of ’em gives a damn about the other  … Why shoul Andy ?! … The PRINCIPAL ‘ of his statement is the ONLY thing of value here … And he said it …

The Media should just have simply ‘ reported ‘ Scheer’s initial statement to us … And then just STFU with their ‘ criticism ‘ … Ya get paid to REPORT … NOT ‘ opine ‘ …

On Saturday , Scheer blamed the Liberals for stirring up the controversy , accusing them of attempting ” to score cheap political points in a very disgusting manner.” Moreover , he argued that initial tweets by Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale and Governor General Julie Payette also didn’t specifically mention mosques or Muslims.

Later , as he took questions from members of the audience , Scheer was asked why he’s never said the word ” Islamophobia.”

” I don’t believe that’s true ” he responded , noting that all parties supported a motion last week in the House of Commons. That motion , which he didn’t describe, condemned the mosque attacks and affirmed the need to ” confront hatred , Islamophobia , and white supremacy , in all their forms.”

And what about the East’s hatred of the West , ‘ Whitephobia ‘ and Islamic SINGULARITY … Never mind ‘ supremacy ‘ … They want to murder ALL ‘ Infidels  ‘ remember !!! …

Source: Scheer: Criticism for not mentioning Muslims in N.Z. statement ‘completely baseless’ | CTV News

Court orders father to support 14-year old daughter’s gender transition ?!!! …

On February 27 , a B.C. judge ruled that physicians could begin injecting a 14-year-old girl with testosterone without parental consent. The ruling demonstrates how changes in family law , education law , and health law , driven by transgender activism , are combining to set children and families up for tragedy.

The case is A.B. v C.D. and E.F. anonymized initials for the child , father , and mother , respectively. I’ll call them Jamie , Clark, and Sarah. Justice Bowden declared that “ attempting to persuade A.B. to abandon treatment ( hormone injections / surgery ) for gender dysphoria ; addressing A.B. by his birth name ; referring to A.B. as a girl or with female pronouns whether to him directly or to third parties ; shall be considered to be family violence under s. 38 of the Family Law Act.

Violence ?!!! …

” If a court finds that “ family violence ” has occurred , the parent responsible could lose custody or access. So , not only did Clark fail to persuade the judge that either parental consent or a fuller hearing into the implications of cross-hormone therapy for Jamie was needed , he has also been ordered to pretend his daughter is a boy and to not counsel her against injecting testosterone or surgically destroying healthy body parts.

Now this following bit of crapola is KEY to the problem here …

Jamie’s doctors at the Gender Clinic decided , and Justice Bowden agreed , that she ( they say “ he ” ) is mature enough to understand the nature , consequences , risks , and benefits of this so called “ treatment ” and does not need her parents’ consent. Jamie reportedly began to identify as male at age 11 , and first told a school counsellor at age 12.

12 ?!!! … CHRIST !!! … Some of ’em at this age still think a fat , white bearded fella comes down the chimney with all sorts of goodies every twenty-forth evening of December !!! …

The article cites a study by Dr. Lisa Littman of Brown University , which surveyed 256 parents of children whose dysphoria appeared in adolescence and found :

• 87% of these children identified as transgender after spending more time online , after “ cluster outbreaks ” among their friends , or both
• In a third of the children’s friend groups, half or more individuals came out as transgender
• Most children who came out as transgender became more popular as a result
• Almost 2/3 of these children had one or more diagnoses of a psychiatric or developmental disorder preceding the onset of gender dysphoria.

Dr. Littman believes that embracing a trans identity may be a way for some of these children to cope with emotional pains and difficulties. The Economist shares the story of Rachel Miller who at age 16 wished to “ transition ” to being a boy , but her mother resisted and found her psychiatric treatment. Now 21 , Rachel understands that she once latched onto a transgender identity to cope with depression and being sexually abused as a child.

And on top of all this BULLSHIT !!! , Clarke has to PAY for this shit !!! …

 

 

Source: Court orders father to support 14-year old daughter’s gender transition – The Post Millennial

Dad’s Dead Pool is in and out with the posting … But here’s a few …

From Dad’s Dead Pool …

This one makes ya think ! …

Hmmm … I wonder why New York and CaLIBfornia want to get rid of it !!! …

With Junior not handling the heat … Anne McLellan joins the list of ‘ dusted off hazbins ‘ to come to his rescue …

The former lawmaker asked to recommend whether the roles of attorney-general and justice minister should be separated in the wake of the SNC-Lavalin affair says she is keeping an open mind. But in her view , the dual role has been handled “ comfortably ” throughout Canada’s history – until now.

“ I was two-hatted ” said Anne McLellan , who was attorney-general and justice minister in a Liberal government from 1997 to 2002 , in an interview. “ I lived with that reasonably comfortably. Others have for 150 years – but that does not mean circumstances don’t change.”

She said getting it right is key to ensuring that Canadians have confidence in the administration of justice. “ I think one takes away from the role how central it is to the functioning of good government and democracy.”

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has given her until June 30 , she said , to recommend whether the federal government should maintain the dual roles of attorney-general and justice minister in one person – as has been the case since Confederation – or split them up. The attorney-general is the government’s top legal adviser ; the justice minister is a cabinet minister as any other.

Testimony before the House of Commons justice committee by Ms. Wilson-Raybould and senior government officials revealed that she was pressed more than 20 times over four months , including by the Prime Minister , and held her ground , before being moved in January to Veterans Affairs , from which she resigned.

“ There’s so much riding on this. The experience of the Gomery inquiry is certainly still ringing in their ears ” Mr. MacKay said , referring to the inquiry into the “ sponsorship scandal ” that contributed to the Liberals’ 2006 election loss.

The experience of Ms. Wilson-Raybould in the SNC-Lavalin affair will be just part of her review , said Ms. McLellan , who also led the government’s task force on cannabis legalization. “ We should not be responding to any single situation.”

When she was attorney-general , things were a little different. The role of director of public prosecutions did not exist until 2006 , when it was created as extra insulation from political influence. But the director’s authority is delegated by the attorney-general , who can issue a public directive allowing him or her to take over a prosecution or steer it in a new direction. Then , as now , the attorney-general was in charge.

But this is something Anne never experienced … Therefore she was always ‘ comfy ‘ when she happily went along with whatever plan was best for re-election …

Ya gotta thank Harper for that effort to diminish that ‘ political interference ‘ in these cases … And just stop and ponder … How many of these have ‘ quietly slipped by ‘ … And then start pontificating KBec !!! … Absolutely mind boggling , to say the least ! …

Upon finding out about Anne being selected to ‘ investigate ‘ this dual role objectively … Andrew Scheer had this to say …

Her name drew derisive laughter from the opposition benches when Mr. Trudeau announced her appointment. Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer asked mockingly whether former Liberal MP Sheila Copps was unavailable – implying that the appointment of Ms. McLellan was partisan.

Good one Andy … Hopefully ya get yourself up to speed with this much needed quick wit to win this November …

Source: Anne McLellan says she’s keeping an open mind as she reviews role of attorney-general, justice minister – The Globe and Mail

‘ Put up or shut up ‘ … And a whole lotta ‘ kiss up ‘ to Junior from way past their ‘ best before dates ‘ Liberals …

Apparently , an old windbag named Judy Sgro , said she thinks Wilson-Raybould and Philpott are providing fodder to the opposition and challenged them to use their parliamentary privilege to air whatever they have to say on the SNC-Lavalin affair.

” It’s either put up or shut up ” Sgro told Chris Hall , host of CBC Radio’s The House , in an interview airing Saturday.

” If you’ve got something to say , you’ve had two months to get out there and say it “…

Obviously , despite the amount of years fools have elected her to office , Judy fails to realize that the ‘ law ‘ of the rules regarding this stipulate the former ATTORNEY GENERAL  not divulge what the MINISTER OF JUSTICE discussed , more importantly , how those ‘ discussions ‘ unfolded , with the ‘ inappropriate threatening ‘ by the Prime Minister and his staff …

As former cabinet members neither lady are permitted to discuss the internal deliberations that would outline the scandal unless they are allowed to do so by an individual with the authority to waive that ‘ institutional stipulation ‘ for specific cases such as this …

That could be an Attorney General  , A Supreme Court ruling or , in this case … The Prime Minister … The Wee Turdo …

When asked if she thought Trudeau was being targeted by Wilson-Raybould and Philpott, Sgro didn’t mince words.

” It certainly appears to be that way ” she said.

Sgro was one of the MPs attending a meeting of the Liberals’ Ontario caucus on Wednesday — a meeting described by people in the room as ” rough ” and ” uncomfortable “…

CBC News reported this week that Philpott faced tough questions from her colleagues at the closed-door meeting. Sources inside the room told CBC News Philpott began by defending her decision to resign from cabinet , saying she was acting on principle and for the good of the country … Some MPs reminded her that the caucus had supported her on sensitive issues , including her handling of medical assistance in dying legislation , and had backed her when she ran into controversy over limo costs in 2016.

The old ‘ Hey … We bullshit the public and scurry from the laws we write for the working stiff public all the time … We’ve lied for you before … Be part of ‘ the team ! ‘…

This is an interesting point … Some at the meeting also told CBC News that Philpott appeared to be taking notes and was asked to stop …

Methinks someone is bitter due to the feeling of impending loss of over-compensated , cushy employment come this November …

Sgro pretty must admits that … Sgro said she thinks the ongoing affair is hurting the Liberal government’s chance of re-election this year and some of her fellow MPs are worried.

But in typical political double speak she states … 

” Let the commissioner do his job. He’ll come back with a recommendation to the House of Commons , with a report , and then whatever action … If any action needs to be done , it’ll be done then “… 

Since Junior , his top aide Gerry Butthead , even the Finance Minister , Bill Morneau , and more than likely , his newly appointed Attorney General , David Lametti , have all circumvented the law to avoid this embarrassment , what are the chances that this so called ‘ Ethics Commissioner ‘ ( who was GIVEN the job by Junior ! ) will consider ‘ law ‘ only when deciding the next step in this prolonged fiasco ? …

 

 

Source: ‘Put up or shut up’: Liberal MP challenges Philpott and Wilson-Raybould over SNC-Lavalin | CBC News