Transgender woman ?! .. NO !!! … Some fucked up fat asshole GUY !!! …

A transgender woman testified before the B.C. Human Rights tribunal Friday complaining that she was refused Brazilian waxes at more than a dozen beauty salons because she is transgender …

A … ‘ WOMAN ‘ ?! … ‘ Scuse me …. You’re saying ” a transgender … WOMAN “… Yadda yadda … Oh I’m hurt … They wouldn’t rub my balls ?! … What’s a woman to do ? … That sort of bullshit thing ?! …

Jessica Yaniv says she’s been repeatedly refused waxing services since 2018. For the past several months , the tribunal has been conducting hearings into the complaints against each of the waxing salons and independent estheticians.

” None of these providers had any issue with anything until I mentioned I was transgender. Why was it not brought up saying … ‘ Hey we don’t do services on male genitalia ‘ ? “…

I got news for ya people … ‘ Jessica ‘ IS NOT a … ‘ Woman ‘ … With balls and a dick that needs some waxing ‘ …

 HE’S a MAN whose head is completely fucked up !!! …

END OF STORY !!! …

WHAT IS THIS HORSESHIT ?!!! …

 

Source: Transgender woman testifies at human rights tribunal after being refused Brazilian wax | CBC News

Celebrating Children In Drag ?!!! …

What are you people smokin’ ?!!! …

The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation ( CBC ) aired its “ Drag Kids ” Thursday night …

 OUR tax dollars at work ?!!! …

Canada’s taxpayer-funded media outlet , which is allotted $1.5 billion dollars a year , promoted its documentary about children performing in drag for the entire month of July. The network used its CBC Kids Twitter profile to ask the question , “ What’s it like to be a KID #DRAGQUEEN ? ”…

The CBC documentary follows four children and their parents as they prepare for and perform in a Montreal drag show for kids.

The CBC promo explains : “ Have you ever dreamed about being someone else for a day ? For some kids , it’s just a dream. They stuff it away in a closet and forget about it. But for others , it’s more than a dream. They reach into that closet and pull out a wig ”…

A scene from the CBC documentary “Drag Kids,” which aired July 25, 2019. YouTube screenshot.

HUH ?!!!… That’s … ” Normal ” ?!!! …

They also deck themselves out with rouge , lip gloss and mascara and dance suggestively on stage. The children are also depicted celebrating the LGBTQ experience at pride parades.

(RELATED: Mother Of Child Drag Queen Complains About Pedophile Sexualizing Her Son)

?!!! …

Speaking to the Daily Caller on Friday, the CBC director of public affairs Chuck Thompson said “ all the reviews today have been excellent ” …

Thompson described “ Drag Kids ” as part of the CBC’s mandate to provide a platform “ where you want to share diverse perspectives ” He hopes the show will “ ignite opinions and encourage debate ”…

WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENED TO THIS WORLD ?!!! …

Source: The Daily Caller

Food for thought …

Facebook spent US$11.7 billion in the first quarter of 2019 … They are on track to spend some $45 billion to operate for the entire year. The company offers its services for ‘ FREE ‘ and still turns a profit …

So what does Facebook sell to make a profit ?…

It sells two things. Targeted access to your attention and access to information about you. Facebook certainly does not think your life is uninteresting or unwatchable. Nor does Google , nor any other social media site , or most Internet edge providers ( part of the argument over “ net neutrality ” is whether edge providers who provide you with your connection to the internet should be able to watch what their customers are doing for profit in much the same way the content providers like Google , Facebook , and Twitter already do.

Maybe your life is not so dull after all …

The bottom line is this … If you think you don’t have anything to hide , then you don’t understand how the modern data economy really works , nor the impact of being caught in a riptide of public opinion. While paranoia might not be the best answer to the problem , neither does claiming there is nothing to hide … 

Source: You Think You Have Nothing To Hide? | Mind Matters

Our overly paid politicians and professionals waste time on this shit ?!!! …

Suppressing testosterone levels in male athletes isn’t enough to eliminate their natural advantages over female athletes , according to a recently published paper in the Journal of Medical Ethics.

The paper’s findings contradict congressional Democrats’ claim that male athletes who identify as transgender don’t have an inherent advantage over their female competitors.

The paper , “ Transwomen in elite sport : scientific and ethical considerations ” concluded that male athletes who identify as transgender women have an “ intolerable ” advantage over their female competitors.

The authors , two bioethics professors and a physiology professor , noted that “ there is very little scientific evidence ” to support the argument that “ hormone therapy will mitigate the advantage transwomen may have in comparison with cis-women athletes ”…

The authors cited research showing that “ healthy young men did not lose significant muscle mass ( or power ) when their circulating testosterone levels were reduced to [ below International Olympic Committee guidelines ] for 20 weeks ”…

“ Moreover , retention of muscle mass could be compensated for by training or other ergogenic methods ” the study continues. “ In addition , the phenomenon of muscle memory means muscle mass and strength can be rebuilt with previous strength exercise making it easier to regain muscle mass later in life even after long intervening periods of inactivity and mass loss ”…

The authors noted that “ indirect effects of testosterone will not be altered by hormone therapy. For example , hormone therapy will not alter bone structure , lung volume or heart size of the transwoman athlete , especially if she transitions postpuberty , so natural advantages including joint articulation , stroke volume and maximal oxygen uptake will be maintained ”…

The authors’ solution is to eliminate binary gender-based categories in sports altogether , rather than excluding biological males from female events.

Unlike the authors , Democrats in Congress have repeatedly downplayed the competitive advantage that biological males have when competing in female athletics.

“ The myth that trans women have a ‘ direct competitive advantage ’ is not supported by medical science , and it continues to stoke fear and violence against one of the most at-risk communities in the world ” Democratic Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar wrote in a January letter to Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison , urging him to investigate USA Powerlifting for barring male weightlifters from female events.

(Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Democrats’ Equality Act would make “ gender identity ” a protected category under federal anti-discrimination laws , which would force public schools to expand female athletic teams to include biological males who identify as transgender girls.

“ Many states have sexual orientation and gender identity nondiscrimination laws , and all of them still have women’s sports ” House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler said during a committee hearing on the bill in April …

Well .. Ya gotta love ‘ Jerry !!! … He’s one ya really need to listen to … Yeah , RIGHT !!! … Little short-assed FU… Oh ..’ Scuse me … Back to the article …

“ Arguments about transgender athletes participating in sports in accordance with their gender identity having competitive advantages have not been borne out ” the New York Democrat continued.

Democratic California Rep. Katie Hill similarly downplayed concerns about the bill’s effect on female athletics.

“ This is fear-mongering about transwomen playing in sports. Are you kidding me ? ” the California Democrat said during the bill’s floor debate in May.

The House passed the bill in May with unanimous support from Democrats , though the Republican-controlled Senate is unlikely to vote on it. Democratic presidential frontrunners have pledged to prioritize the bill’s passage if elected.

Spokespersons for Hill , Nadler and Omar didn’t return requests for comment on the research challenging their positions.

Male athletes have racked up victories in girls’ and women’s sports. A biological male , Laurel Hubbard won two gold medals in women’s weightlifting at the 2019 Pacific Games earlier this month.

Two biologically male runners , both of whom identify as transgender , have dominated high school girls’ trackin Connecticut , leading at least one female competitor to cry foul.

Franklin Pierce University ( FPU ) runner CeCe Telfer , a biological male , won an NCAA women’s championshipin May. Telfer won the DII women’s 400-meter hurdles by more than a second. Telfer previously ran a variety of events for Franklin Pierce’s men’s team , during most of which time he went by the first name Craig , according to school records.

NCAA policy is that male athletes who identify as transgender can compete on women’s teams if they suppress their testosterone levels for a full calendar year. The NCAA in 2011 published an explainer calling it “ not well founded ” to assume “ that being born with a male body automatically gives a transgender woman an unfair advantage when competing against non-transgender women ”…

TOTAL CRAP !!! …

Sitdown between Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Nancy Pelosi …

Where’s the cameras when there’s some real entertainment ?!!! …

Feuding House Democrats Nancy Pelosi and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez , having been driven into each other’s unloving arms by President Trump’s tweets , held a sitdown , kind of the way mobsters do, presumably to persuade those of us on the outside that all’s well between them , and above all , to get Trump to stop tweeting about them. Both are machine pols , after all , and rival machine pols aren’t that different from rival mafia families. They have common interests and common enemies , after all.

Both came out of their sitdown Friday assuring us all was capiche. According to Fox News :

 ” We sat down today, we had a good meeting. The congresswoman is a very gracious member of Congress , so we had a very positive conversation “…

( Yeah right ! .. You really think she’s ‘ gracious ‘ Nanc !!! ) …

She added : ” I feel … it’s like you’re in a family. In a family , you have your differences ( cat fights ! ) , but you’re still family. We just had a meeting to clear the air “…

( I can understand that ! … Two bubblin’ , boilin’ estrogen sources in the same vat need some oxygen to relieve the pressure !! ) …

Ah … The family … But of course …

View image on Twitter

Notice the broad natural grin, the merry eyes , in the face of Ocasio-Cortez. Notice the strained forced smile and the mirthless eyes in the face of Pelosi , the unnatural face thrust forward , the grippy hand on her thigh …

That’s some ” nice meeting ” as they put it … The happiness level , to say the least , is assymetrical …

Here are the eyes :

One of these characters is smiling … The other is not …

It’s a great one to watch , because the one thing that’s sure about this is that the declared peace between the two isn’t going to last …

Source: So who won that sitdown between Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Nancy Pelosi?

A take from Conrad Black …

Even I, as someone who has been blue in the face shrieking that the Mueller inquiry would be an unutterable fiasco since the day it was announced, could not have imagined such a terrible shambles as the world watched, gape-mouthed (like the witness much of the time), when Robert Mueller appeared before the House Judiciary and Oversight committees on Wednesday.

The Democratic line that began with the president being a traitor who would be removed from office and imprisoned, and descended to impeachment but clinging to the Oval Office furniture by the grace of Republican senators, to general odium for moral turpitude, is now reduced to hypocritical pieties about ethics and the robo-repetition that “No one is above the law.”

Wednesday marks the decisive turning from squeezing the last drop out of the lemon of the president’s alleged crimes, to the long-delayed investigation of the investigators.

The revelation that the Steele dossier—cited in Hillary Clinton’s election memoir as evidence of Trump’s treason—was commissioned and paid for by the Clinton campaign was dismissed as a ”talking point” by the Washington Post and the Democrats generally. The fact that it was the basis of false foreign intelligence surveillance applications was disputed and then allowed to pass and fade with full media silence.

The Strzok-Page text messages revealing a rabid partisanship on the part of some of Mueller’s leading collaborators, the instant transition of Clinton’s official whitewashers into Trump’s defamers and tormentors was dismissed as improper aspersing of distinguished professionals. Mueller was portrayed as a virtual Superman of law enforcement integrity, a “Republican” war hero and peerless exemplar of faithful, selfless public and patriotic service, and the most knowledgeable and formidable of the country’s experts on law enforcement and clean government. He would unmask and destroy the perfidious ogre who had swindled, flim-flammed, and sleazed his way into the White House.

Mueller may once have deserved some of that iconization, though a number of episodes, including his handling of the FBI corruption case in Boston, the Atlanta Olympic bomber affair, and the Uranium One affair, leave room for some reservations. But it became clear on Wednesday that he did not remember much of anything about “his” report, could not even retrieve from memory the much bandied-about word “conspiracy,” contradicted himself, and stonewalled the committees on many questions that appeared to be appropriate for him to answer, (though many questions he rightly declined to answer).

Still, it was a bit rich that Mueller criticized the president in his written answers for stating that he (Trump) did not remember the correct answer to some of the special counsel’s (Mueller’s) questions, given the porosity of his own memory. Never mind the invocation by his successor at the FBI, James Comey, 250 times under oath that he didn’t recall recent matters highly germane to his official duties and actions.

David Axelrod, current spiritual holder of the of the Saul Alinsky Prize for slippery political conjuration, tweeted after a couple of hours that the hearings were “very painful.” They were, and not just for those who were hoping that the hearings would grease the skids for the Democratic presidential impeachment launch. Mueller was drawn, pallid, hesitant, and inarticulate, and very unfamiliar with much of what he had been asked to recall and answer. He appeared to be ill and in no condition to deal with such a challenging session, and implausible as the real guiding force behind this massive and completely redundant inquest.

By the end of the day, there was a general recognition that the page had been turned. The more rabid Democrats may continue to huff and puff and shake their fists at the sky like King Lear, and promise vigilance against the machinations of the Kremlin. But those responsible for this monstrous disgrace to the intelligence services and the FBI that merged parts of them with the dirty tricks division of the Democratic National Committee, cannot delay their day of reckoning much longer.

The Coming Backlash for Democrats …

The real origins of this satanic sequence of outrages and the real authors of this ridiculous special counsel report will be unmasked. The Democratic impeachers will be overwhelmed by the gathering backlash.

Mueller has been a respectable front for a ghastly assault on the Constitution, and at the end, he was, understandably, a reluctant witness, but—brave old soldier and Bronze Star winner that he is—he took a bullet for the platoon rather than accept the attorney general’s offer of assistance if he wanted to ignore the House subpoenas to appear. He wanted to retain his professional standing while fronting a horrible mutation of the political system. It was a little like Theresa May, the British prime minister who left office the same day, trying to leave Europe and remain in it simultaneously.

As Washington Dinsdale said in the 1939 Marlene Dietrich-James Stewart film “Destry Rides Again,” one “must choose between the bottle and the badge.” Mueller tried to turn an inability to exonerate—a standard that he admitted has never been asked or expected of any kind of American prosecutor—into something the Democratic congressional allies of his investigative team could use to continue their malicious and illegal harassment of the president. He never should have published the second volume of his report, which is a pastiche of selective and spliced scraps scarcely more rigorously composed than the Steele dossier and apparently intended, with no more success, to serve the same partisan interests.

It is a great sadness, a great victory, and a great irony. The spectacle of a stooped and aged Robert Mueller, after he had (voluntarily) been so dishonestly used by the president’s enemies, was an objectively sad one, a sorry swan-song to a substantial career. The victory of the Trump Republicans is seismic, and announces the imminent exposure and punishment of those who abused the system to attack the president and deform the political system.

The irony is two-fold. If Trump’s enemies had not launched the Russian collusion nonsense, all their pre-electoral skullduggery would not have been unearthed—if they had given him the normal honeymoon for incoming presidents, a serene ambiance would have settled Washington down, at least for a year or so, and they would now be wallowing in their Washington lobbying and other sinecures.

The second irony is that there is plenty of room to attack this president in more traditional and acceptable ways. His policies have mainly been successful; but he is too bumptious, egocentric, and stylistically annoying for many people, and the Democrats could have made something of an issue out of his personality.

Instead, they have struck out, will have no window through which to fire live ammunition at Trump, and will have to take the heat for their corrupt actions. They promised “scorched earth,” and are immolating themselves.

We are now between the lightning and the thunder …

Found at

Source: Robert Mueller Can’t Recall – American Greatness

Another score for the Trumpster !!! …

The U.S. Supreme Court has cleared the way for the administration of President Donald Trump to tap Pentagon funds to build sections of a border wall with Mexico.

The conservative-majority court on a 5-4 vote blocked in full a ruling by a federal judge in California barring the Republican president from spending the money on the basis that Congress did not specifically authorize the funds to be spent on the wall project fiercely opposed by Democrats and Mexico’s government.

The Supreme Court action means the Trump administration can tap the funds and begin work on four contracts it has awarded.

” Wow ! Big VICTORY on the Wall. The United States Supreme Court overturns lower court injunction , allows Southern Border Wall to proceed. Big WIN for Border Security and the Rule of Law ! ” Trump tweeted just minutes after the court acted.

The money Trump identified includes $3.6 billion from military construction funds , $2.5 billion in Defence Department money and $600 million from the Treasury Department’s asset forfeiture fund.

The case before the Supreme Court involved just the $2.5 billion in Defence Department funds , which the administration says will be used to construct more than 100 miles of fencing. One project would replace 46 miles of barrier in New Mexico for $789 million US. Another would replace 63 miles in Arizona for $646 million. The other two projects in California and Arizona are smaller.

The justices who lifted the freeze on the money did not give a lengthy explanation for their decision. But they said among their reasons was that the government had made a ” sufficient showing at this stage ” that those bringing the lawsuit don’t have a right to challenge the decision to use the money.

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg , Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan would not have allowed construction to begin. Justice Stephen Breyer said he would have allowed the government to finalize the contracts for the segments but not begin construction while the lawsuit proceeded. The administration had argued that if it wasn’t able to finalize the contracts by Sept. 30 , then it would lose the ability to use the funds. The administration had asked for a decision quickly.

And THAT was the only hope for the Democraps !!! … Play long games with the lawyers so time runs out !!! …

Sorry ‘ bout your luck assholes !!! …

Source: U.S. Supreme Court clears way for Trump to use disputed $2.5B for border wall | CBC News