


By Daniel Hemel
Daniel Hemel is an assistant professor of law at the University of Chicago.
March 26

It took special counsel Robert S. Mueller III nearly two years to conclude that President Trump may have — but may not have — obstructed justice. It took Attorney General William P. Barr and his deputy , Rod J. Rosenstein , only two days to decide that Trump should not be charged with obstruction. How did Barr and Rosenstein make up their minds so quickly on a question that the special counsel struggled with for so long ?…
By reading the summary ( Albeit NOT sufficiently orgnised by Mueller , s asked ! ) and understanding the Special Investigator’s ‘ non-decision ‘and consequent referral to Barr’s discretion …
Barr sent a letter to Congress on Sunday that offers little explanation for the decision not to prosecute the president. The letter correctly states the elements of obstruction of justice — corrupt intent , obstructive conduct and a sufficient nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding — and then states that Mueller’s report “ identifies no actions that , in our judgment ” satisfy all three criteria … The letter says nothing more about the last two elements of obstruction , but it does offer this about corrupt intent :
“ While not determinative , the absence of … evidence [ of collusion ] bears upon the President’s intent with respect to obstruction.”
I’ll bring up the argument that reinforces that statement further along …
That conclusion is questionable for reasons beyond its haste. It’s black letter law that a defendant can satisfy the corrupt intent criterion for obstruction even if the defendant himself committed no underlying crime. For example , the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit recently ruled that a defendant could be convicted of obstruction “ even if his primary motivation was to extricate the sister of his childhood friend from a troubled situation.”
A court in Utah held in 2013 that a defendant could be liable for obstruction where his only apparent motive was to protect a friend from a criminal charge.
By these standards , it’s easy to see what possible motives Trump may have had to obstruct justice , even if no collusion with Russia was involved.
The writer now indulges us with his demonstration of the wonderful ‘ imagination ‘ he possesses …
He ‘ may have ‘ wanted , for example , to shield Michael T. Flynn , his first national security adviser , from criminal liability. In February 2017 , the president told FBI Director James B. Comey that Flynn “ is a good guy ” according to Comey … And Trump implored Comey to drop the FBI’s investigation of Flynn. Flynn later pleaded guilty to charges that he lied to investigators about his conversations with the Russian ambassador. Trump fired Comey in May 2017.
Funny how Comey managed to disregard a far greater amount of PROVEN evidence in order to not indict Von Pantsuit and Danny boy here can’t understand why Trump’s sticking up for a distinguished military figure whom he felt got tripped up by the over zealous investigators …
Or perhaps the president suspected — correctly — that the investigation of his longtime personal attorney Michael Cohen would churn up evidence that Trump paid adult-film actress Stormy Daniels to stay quiet about an alleged sexual encounter the two had just months after Trump’s wife , Melania , gave birth to Trump’s youngest child , Barron. Trump may have feared the political fallout from revelations that he lied to the American people about his business dealings with Russia , and then instructed his eldest son , Donald Trump Jr. , to lie about conversations with Russian representatives during the 2016 presidential campaign.
As stated in previous posts , the Cohen inctment has never had anything to do with the election , nor the dreampt up ‘ conspiracy ‘ with Russia … And the lone connection with Russia of any sort was discovered though means of acquired by falsified information to obtain a bogus FISA court ruling …
That’s TWO people’s careers ruined by the quest of the Left to ‘ delegitimize ‘ a duly elected individual to the office of President simply because they despise the man … He ponders on …
Or maybe Trump simply wanted to cover up the fact that the Russian government intervened on his behalf during the race — even if that intervention occurred independently of Trump’s campaign. Trump has only begrudgingly acknowledged that the intelligence community agrees that Russia wanted him to win; ever sensitive about his loss to Democrat Hillary Clinton in the popular vote, perhaps he worried that evidence of Russian meddling would cast further doubt on the legitimacy of his presidency.
One possibility is that Mueller’s report contains additional evidence and possibly encouraged Cohen …
Danny boy’s entire article , titled ” Barr Is Wrong ” , no less ! , is nothing more than a collection of ” What ifs ” …” or perhaps ” …” Or maybe’s ” …
William Barr doesn’t need to proofread 448 pages of documentation to understand fully that you can’t indict , never mind convict ! , an individual on ” may have or may not have’s ” …
There’s even a glimmer of a hope for wee minded Danny here where he actually points out …
” Of course , the fact that Trump would have had many motives to obstruct justice doesn’t mean that he actually did so “…
That is the MAIN point , as well as the ONLY point found in his article …
Any this guy’s a ‘ lawyer ‘…

Source: Barr is wrong: Obstruction of justice doesn’t require another underlying crime – The Washington Post


And , again … I didn’t even need to see this picture know what type of a person I would be lookin’ at …























Trump is a funny guy , if only they would give him the chance , which they won’t , their loss , and our loss. These years could have been fun. Instead , we are a nation in the dumps , thanks to their gloomy politics , there is darkness in every room , as it was for the White House Correspondents Dinner , a flop for being so joyless , without Trump to liven it up. Have we become Germans ? Germany has never been a funny country , as Robin Williams reminded them for “ killing all the funny people ”.

